Software Tools for the Food Industry

   

   An eNewsletter for Food Processors

February  2004      •   Special  Edition        •       US  Food Processors

In This Issue:

Mad Cow: Taking a Bite out of business

Six Sigma: how it can help your company

Ask the Expert: will bar coding offer traceablity?

 

 

 

Contact Us



 

Mike Sardinha

Featured Speaker on Traceability

Food Safety Summit
March 17 2004

 

Look for our ad in February
Meat & Poultry


 

 

Mad Cow Mania:

Taking a Bite out of your business?

The discovery of mad cow disease in the United States has set off a scramble among companies to ensure customers that their products are safe. USDA is seriously considering a national identification plan.

Rising concerns about corporate legal liability and the potential for bioterrorism are two of the prime factors fueling the race to develop systems that would make it easier to trace the origin of every burger, banana and bacon slice sold in stores or consumed in restaurants.

Gaping holes in the current patchwork system used to identify, test and trace diseased livestock and contaminated meat have been plainly exposed by the experiences of the past month.

By the time a positive test for bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, came back Dec. 23, the former dairy cow from Mabton, Wash., had been slaughtered, its meat processed and shipped to market.

Are you worried about mad cow disease entering the food supply? * 56994 responses

 

Very much so
30%

 

I'm still a bit concerned
33%

 

Not at all
36%

 

 

Are you eating less beef since mad cow was discovered in the U.S.? * 57492 responses

 

Yes, I'm holding off for now
35%

 

No, I'm eating it as always
59%

 

No, I don't eat beef
6%

 

Agriculture
Secretary Ann Veneman voiced support for a national animal identification plan that would allow federal officials to trace back any contaminated food to its source within 48 hours, identifying every stop in an animal’s life cycle. The plan is generally supported by beef producers and packers, although some critics say the currently proposed timetable should be speeded up.

“It’s a major critical area in terms of liability and litigation to be able to prove where the product came from,” said Tom Buis, vice president of government relations with the National Farmers Union. "Even without a mandatory national identification program, many larger food retailers are beginning to demand a verifiable trace-back system because of “overwhelming” liability issues, he said.

In addition to legal liability, fears of bioterrorism have sparked growing interest in systems that allow officials to quickly verify the origin of food products.

“The trouble is, you’ve got a huge industry which is very complicated with a lot of different participants, and everybody has got a different idea of how things should work,” said John Nalivka, a cattle industry consultant based in Vale, Ore.

“I think it's urgent, and the sooner we all get together as an industry and get this thing accomplished, the better for everybody,” he said. “Food safety is the No. 1 issue facing the industry today, and it’s been that way for the past decade. I think the time has come that we all need to work toward this idea of traceability of food in this country.”

The question meat processors need to ask themselves is, can we NOT afford to have traceability?

In the bigger issue, once systems are in place for traceability, processors will realize better yield and costing. With prodution controls, costing and yield - tracebility becomes an automatic by product.

Email us for more information at info@catsquared.com

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

Six Sigma

How It Can Help Your Company

 


If you’ve tried to find the magic bullet to improve quality, you’ve probably survived a few initiatives—TQM, ISO, OE, HACCP—learned the seven habits of highly effective people, studied critical success factors and read Quality is Free. You may have preached quality to your organization (or been preached to) for years. Then there’s Six Sigma. How is it different? Will profits increase? Why should you pay attention?

What is Six Sigma?

Six Sigma is a systematic process for eliminating defects, a way to reach and maintain new levels of quality. A company using the system understands and satisfies customer needs. Six Sigma manages with facts, data and statistics. The informal Six Sigma motto is, “In God we trust, all others must have data!”

The Greek letter sigma is used in statistics to indicate standard deviation—amount of variation—in a set of data or a process. The term Six Sigma refers to a level of 3.4 defects per million opportunities: Nearly perfect.

The Sigma scale is equivalent to the earthquake Richter scale; every unit represents a 10-fold increase. Achieving 99% quality translates to 10,000 defects per million and a sigma of 3.8; 99.9% quality means 1,000 defects per million and a sigma of 4.6; 99.99% quality yields 100 defects per million for a sigma score of 5.2. Six Sigma represents a quality level of perfection unachievable for many industries.

Six Sigma performance, and better, is attainable in many aspects of the food industry. For example, if the defect is the presence of live botulism bacteria in canned goods, a performance level of 3.4 defects per million cans would actually be much too low; 3.4 defects per billion or per trillion range is an expected goal.

Where E. coli and Salmonella are concerned, fresh meat and poultry can’t claim that level of food safety. In these industries, Sigma values are generally in the three to four range. Where are your products? For every million customers consuming one of your food products, how many are dissatisfied?

The Five Steps

Six Sigma projects are executed in five steps: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control. During each of these phases, data and the use of statistical tools are critical. Many of the tools are not new, yet work together and are applied with a discipline that focuses on achieving and maintaining changes in performance capabilities.

Easy as Pie

Company X makes pies, and at the end of every production line is a QA station where “reject” pies are pulled off the line. The rejection rate averages 2%. No human inspector is perfect and the definition of sub-quality pie is subjective. Some pies pass inspection that contain what some customers would call defects. When numbers of customer complaints increase, the company lectures the QA inspectors on rejecting more defective pies. Yields drop and shift supervisors are pressured to improve declining yields.

Six Sigma steps in

Define: The Black Belt examines data, and learns that customers have been reporting burnt crust. The problem is re-stated—according to Six Sigma—using data: “Burnt crust is defined as a black spot greater than 1/2 inch across on a pie. The 1.2% burnt pies cause losses of $1.2 million dollars per year from rejected pies and 30 monthly customer complaints.” This is a Sigma performance of 3.8. A goal of a minimum 70% decrease in defects is set.
Measure: Data is collected on the prevalence of this defect: Area of the crust on which burning occurs, type of filling, type of crust, style of edge crimping, baking line, shift, tin size and baking temperature are evaluated. Collecting this detailed data is difficult and time consuming, and requires extra staff at the QA stations for two weeks.
Analyze: Statistical analysis reveals that 70% of the burnt areas are located at the edges. The low-shortening dough Type A burns occur predominantly on pies with a particular crimper style, while dough Type B is not sensitive to crimp style. Analysis also reveals that 90% of all burnt pies are produced on the outside lanes of Line 2.
Improve: All low-shortening pies use the crimper style that does not burn as easily. The oven for Line 2 is tested and found to be hotter at the outside lanes. Maintenance adjusts the temperature balance. This not only prevents burning, but saves electricity. Data is collected showing that now 0.1% of pies are rejected as burnt, yielding a Sigma score of 4.6, which saves $1.1 million dollars per year and reduces customer complaints to two or three per month.
Control: Manufacturing changes all Type A dough pies to specify correct crimper type. R&D puts testing of crimper style and dough type into the standard testing regime for new pie types.

Maintenance installs multiple temperature sensors across oven widths and Programmable Logical Controllers (PLCs) to control variation.

Correcting problems, improving quality and improving customer satisfaction doesn’t cost money. These steps save money.

Six Sigma is an implementation and improvement tool; if your organization needs to progress, this may be the right tool.

For implementation of Six Sigma processes in the meat industry contact us at CAT2.

 

Copyrighted material, Food Quality magazine, www.foodquality.com. Reprinted with permission.


 

Ask the Expert

Our team at CAT has many years of experience in the food processing industry.  Please submit your questions concerning plant issues, processing problems, etc. 



Question: Will bar coding provide adequate traceability?

Answer:   No. Bar coding will provide information as product code, production date and weight. However, bar codes will not give you vendor lot information, which contains lot numbers from your vendor's raw materials, spices or dry goods, contained within the product. If any of these sub lots are responsible for recall, then enormous amounts of product would have to be recalled, unless your system contains this sub lot information.

Please submit future newsletter questions to: newsletter@catsquared.com

 

 

© Catsquared.com, Inc., 2003. All rights reserved.

Any comments concerning this newsletter, please forward to:

newsletter@catsquared.com